Annex 3
Ombudsman Cases
Directorate |
Service Area |
Date of Final Decision |
Outcome |
Summary of Final Decision |
Actions |
Completed or Ongoing |
|
21 011 043 |
Adult Social Care and Integration |
Adults |
16/06/2022 |
Upheld: maladministration and injustice. |
Mr X complained about the Council’s handling of his parents’ home care package and his complaints. There was fault in how the Council failed to review Mr X’s parents’ care plans and did not follow the correct safeguarding process when investigating some concerns about Mr X’s parents. The Council has already made some service improvements, and we have made further recommendations for it to address the personal injustice caused to Mr X. |
Within one
month of the date of the final decision statement (by the 15th
July), the Council will: |
Completed |
22002711 |
Place |
Community Safety |
22/06/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries - out of jurisdiction. |
We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s prosecution of Mr X for noise nuisance. We cannot consider matters which have been or are subject to court proceedings. We will not exercise discretion to consider matters which Mr X was aware of more than 12 months before he complained to us. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner. |
N.A |
N.A |
22 003 459 |
Place |
Planning & Environment |
24/06/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries - no further action. |
We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s involvement in his neighbour Mr Y’s development which damaged his tree, resulting in its loss. There is not enough evidence of Council fault causing Mr X’s claimed injustice to warrant us investigating. Mr X’s complaint is a claim of property damage and loss, which is a legal liability issue for the courts to determine. It is reasonable for Mr X to take the matter to court and pursue the compensation he seeks. |
N.A |
N.A |
21 018 087 |
Place |
Highways & Transport |
29/06/2022 |
Not upheld: no further action. |
Mr X complained the Council failed to make a report public at least five clear days before a committee meeting. Mr X complained this prevented the committee meeting from examining the report and resulted in blue-badge holders being prevented from accessing the city centre. The Ombudsman discontinued our investigation of this complaint as further investigation of the Council would not achieve a worthwhile outcome for Mr X. |
N.A |
N.A |
22004677 |
Place |
Planning & Environment |
12/07/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries - out of jurisdiction. |
We cannot investigate this complaint that the Council’s scheme to tackle climate change is a waste of public money. This is because the alleged injustice affects all or most people in the Council’s area. |
N.A |
N.A |
22004249 |
Place |
Highways & Transport |
14/07/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries - out of jurisdiction. |
We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to the complainant’s reports of defects in the surface of his road. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s response to the concerns raised about the road, and it is reasonable to expect the complainant to pursue a court remedy if he thinks the Council is responsible for damage to his vehicle or should conduct further repairs. |
N.A |
N.A |
22 005 245 |
Place |
Highways & Transport |
22/07/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries - out of jurisdiction. |
We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint that the Council has failed to maintain the road outside her home. This is because it is reasonable for Mrs B to apply for a court order which requires the Council to repair the road. |
N.A |
N.A |
21 016 917 |
Place |
Parking |
29/07/2022 |
Upheld: fault & injustice– no further action, Organisation already remedied. |
Miss X complained the Council failed to consider the impact on her guest house business when it introduced its digital parking permits. Miss X also says the system is not flexible or suitable for guesthouse businesses when requesting or amending online permits. She says this has caused her frustration, confusion, and anxiety as well as monetary loss. We find fault with the Council for failing to properly explain its concessions and failing to consult trade organisations about implementing digital parking. This caused an injustice to Miss X, however, we are satisfied the Council has now remedied any injustice caused. We do not find fault with the Council for the implementation or flexibility of the online digital system. |
N.A |
N.A |
21 016 898 |
Customer and Commuinties |
Council tax |
16/08/2022 |
Upheld: fault & injustice |
Ms X complained about how the Council handled her council tax account. Specifically, she complained the Council failed to award her a single person discount and council tax support and delayed in updating her council tax account. The Council was delayed in updating Ms X’s account. However, it has apologised and offered to set up a payment plan which is appropriate to remedy the injustice caused. The Council was not at fault in how it awarded Ms X single person discount and council tax support |
N.A |
N.A |
22 000880 |
Place |
Waste |
16/08/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries - out of jurisdiction. |
Ms X complains the Council failed to collect waste from a block of flats maintained by a company she works for. We will discontinue our investigation into Ms X’s complaint as we cannot say that Ms X is a suitable representative and she has stopped responding to our correspondence |
N.A |
N.A |
21 011789 |
Children and Education |
Transitions |
16/08/2022 |
upheld fault and injustice |
Mr and Mrs X complained the Council poorly managed their child, Y’s, transition from children’s services to adult services as a care leaver. They say this caused them and Y distress and affected Y’s health. They also say the Council handled their complaint poorly. The Council is at fault. There were faults during the transition planning process and with complaints handling. The Council has agreed to apologise to Mr and Mrs X and Y, make remedy payments in recognition of the uncertainty and distress caused and act to improve its services. |
Within one
month of the final decision, the Council will: |
Completed
Ongoing |
22 006 033 |
Place |
Waste |
18/08/2022 |
closed after initial enquiries NFA |
We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council missing some of her bin collections. The matters complained of did not cause Mrs X such a significant personal injustice to warrant an investigation. |
N.A |
na |
22 006 027 |
Place |
Licensing |
08/08/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries - no further action. |
We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to revoke the complainant’s taxi licence. This is because the complainant appealed to the magistrates and because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. |
N.A |
na |
22 006 407 |
Children and Education |
Education |
12/09/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries - no further action |
We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to issue final Education Health and Care Plans for Mrs X‘s son following reviews of the Plan in 2019-20 and 2020-21. The fault in the form of delay by the Council is unlikely to have caused sufficient injustice to warrant investigation by us. |
N.A |
na |
22 007
797 |
Adult Social Care and Integration |
Adults |
27/09/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries - no further action |
We
will not investigate Ms C’s complaint about lack of
care |
na |
na |
22 007 040 |
Customer and Communities |
Council tax |
28/09/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries - no further action |
We will not investigate this complaint about enforcement action the Council took for council tax arrears. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. |
n.a |
n.a |
22 008 225 |
Place |
Highways & Transport |
04/10/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries - out of jurisdiction. |
We will not investigate this complaint about highway maintenance. This is because the court is better placed to consider the complaint and it is reasonable to expect Mr Y to use his right to approach the court about the matter. |
n.a |
n.a |
21 016 897 |
Adult Social Care and Integration / Children and Education |
Adults |
30/09/2022 |
Upheld:Fault and Injustice. |
Ms X complained about the Council’s handling of her disabled son, Mr F’s care between 2020 and 2022 following a safeguarding investigation. There was fault identified by a safeguarding investigation around the care Mr F received at a care home commissioned by the Council. There was then poor communication and delay in putting funding in place when Mr F moved into a temporary care home. The Council agreed to apologise and pay Ms X a total of £600 to remedy the distress and uncertainty caused by the faults. There was no fault in the Council issuing Ms X with an invoice for outstanding care fee contributions or with how it managed Mr F’s move to a permanent supported living placement. |
By
28/10/2022: |
Completed |
22 008 647 |
Place |
Highways & Transport |
07/10/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries - no further action. |
We will not investigate this complaint about street numbering. This is because any fault has not caused him a significant personal injustice. |
n.a |
N/A |
22006774 |
Place |
Housing |
10/10/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries - out of jurisdiction. |
We will not investigate this complaint about the Council as a registered social housing provider because we have no jurisdiction to investigate. |
n.a |
N/A |
22 001 187 |
Adult Social Care and Integration |
Adults |
17/10/2022 |
Upheld:Fault and Injustice. |
Mrs F complained about the Council’s decision to apply a top up on her mother’s care charge contributions. She also complained about the advice and support she received. We found fault in the way the Council applied its top up charge and the support it provided Mrs F with finding suitable care homes for her mother. The Council agreed to apologise to Mrs F, remove its top up charges, and make payment to acknowledge the injustice this caused her. |
By 17th November 2022 :
1.apologise in writing
to Mrs F and pay her £150 to acknowledge the distress and
uncertainty she experienced as a result of the Council handling of
Mrs X’s care charge contributions and its social workers
limited support for her requests.
Within 3 months :
4. review
its existing policy to ensure a consistent approach on top up
charges. This includes where an individual has been assessed to be
able to afford a more expensive care home, has refused the
Council’s offer of a care home and agreed to meet such
charges in writing. The Council has no duty to source care
arrangements for service users who are self-funders of their
care. 5. provide training to its staff to ensure timely accurate advice and guidance is provided to residential care users, or their representatives, regarding top up charges. And, where applicable, requests for support with finding suitable care homes are actioned without delay. |
Ongoing |
22 006 869 |
Place |
Waste |
24/10/2022 |
Upheld: Fault and Injustice. |
Mr L complains in relation to a number of missed garden waste collections by the Council. He also says the Council’s customer service and complaints process has been poor. We found fault by the Council, which had already fully acknowledged its failings and the unsatisfactory service provided. This caused Mr L an injustice and the Council has agreed to our recommendations to remedy this. |
By 24th November 2022:
1) Provide
a fresh apology to Mr L for the fault and injustice
identified.
|
Ongoing |
22 009 413 |
Place |
Housing |
28/10/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries: out of jurisdiction |
We cannot
investigate issues relating to the |
N/A |
N/A |